REVIEW OF NEURAXIAL TECHNIQUES IN ANAESTHESIA: RISKS, CAUSES, AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SPINAL CORD INJURIES

Main Article Content

G’oyibov S.S.
Nematulloev T.K.

Abstract

Neuraxial procedures, including spinal and epidural anesthesia, may carry potential complications. Although rare, spinal cord injuries resulting from anesthetic practices (referred to as Anaes-SCI remain a significant concern for surgical patients. This systematic review aims to identify high-risk patient profiles, summarize the causes and consequences of SCI associated with neuraxial techniques in anesthesia, and provide management recommendations. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in accordance with Cochrane guidelines, and specific inclusion criteria were employed to identify relevant studies. Of the initial 384 studies screened, 31 underwent critical appraisal, and their data were extracted and analyzed. The findings of this review indicate that the primary risk factors for Anaes-SCI were extreme age, obesity, and diabetes. Anaes-SCI resulted from various causes, including hematoma, trauma, abscess, ischemia, and infarction, among others. The consequences predominantly included motor deficits, sensory loss, and pain. Delayed treatment for Anaes-SCI was frequently reported. Despite the potential complications, neuraxial techniques continue to be among the preferred choices for opioid-sparing pain management, contributing to reduced patient morbidity, improved outcomes, shorter hospital stays, and prevention of pain becoming chronic, with associated economic benefits. This review underscores the importance of meticulous patient management and close monitoring during neuraxial anesthesia procedures to minimize the risk of spinal cord injury and associated complications.

Article Details

How to Cite
G’oyibov S.S., & Nematulloev T.K. (2023). REVIEW OF NEURAXIAL TECHNIQUES IN ANAESTHESIA: RISKS, CAUSES, AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SPINAL CORD INJURIES. World Scientific Research Journal, 20(1), 145–155. Retrieved from http://www.wsrjournal.com/index.php/wsrj/article/view/2844
Section
Статьи

References

Agarwal A., Kishore K. Complications and controversies of regional anaesthesia: A review. Indian J. Anaesth. 2009;53:543–553.

Bulow P.M., Biering-Sorensen F. Paraplegia, a severe complication to epidural analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 1999;43:233–235. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.430221.x.

Campos M.G., Peixoto A.R., Fonseca S., Santos F., Pinho C., Leite D. Assessment of main complications of regional anesthesia recorded in an acute pain unit in a tertiary care university hospital: A retrospective cohort. Braz. J. Anesthesiol. 2022;72:605–613. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.03.011.

Drummond J.C., Krane E.J., Tomatsu S., Theroux M.C., Lee R.R. Paraplegia after epidural-general anesthesia in a Morquio patient with moderate thoracic spinal stenosis. Can. J. Anaesth. 2015;62:45–49. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0247-1.

Fabio C., Romualdo D., Eugenio A.F., Vittoradolfo T., Massimiliano V.A., Giovanna R. Thoracic Unilateral Spinal Cord Injury After Spinal Anaesthesia for Total Hip Replacement: Fate or Mistake? Turk. J. Anaesthesiol. Reanim. 2017;45:116–118. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2016.32967.

Gadsden J., Warlick A. Regional anesthesia for the trauma patient: Improving patient outcomes. Local Reg. Anesth. 2015;8:45–55. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S55322.

Hewson D.W., Bedforth N.M., Hardman J.G. Spinal cord injury arising in anaesthesia practice. Anaesthesia. 2018;73:43–50. doi: 10.1111/anae.14139.

Kotoda M., Mochizuki N., Matsuoka T., Kondoh D., Matsukawa T. Successful epidural anesthesia in a patient with an extremely shallow epidural space: A case report. Anaesth. Pain Intensive Care. 2018;22:224–226.

Matlubov M., Nematulloev T. MAIN HEMODYNAMIC PATTERNS IN OVERWEIGHT PATIENTS DURING PROCTOLOGICAL SURGERY //Science and Innovation. – 2022. – Т. 1. – №. 6. – С. 263-270.

Meyer M.J., Krane E.J., Goldschneider K.R., Klein N.J. Case report: Neurological complications associated with epidural analgesia in children: A report of 4 cases of ambiguous etiologies. Anesth. Analg. 2012;115:1365–1370. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826918b6.

Nagathan D.S., Singh B.P., Ghatanatti S., Sankhwar S.N. Spinal cord injury: A rare complication following thoracic epidural anesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Acta Anaesthesiol. Taiwanica. 2012;50:81–83. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2012.05.001.

Neal J.M., Bernards C.M., Hadzic A., Hebl J.R., Hogan Q.H., Horlocker T.T., Lee L.A., Rathmell J.P., Sorenson E.J., Suresh S., et al. ASRA Practice Advisory on Neurologic Complications in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2008;33:404–415. doi: 10.1097/00115550-200809000-00003.

Olawin A.M., Das J.M. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2022. Spinal Anesthesia.

Schildt E. Low spinal cord injuries following spinal anesthesia. Acta Chir. Scand. 1947;95:101–131. doi: 10.1097/00000542-194711000-00023.

Stroud C.C., Markel D., Sidhu K. Complete paraplegia as a result of regional anesthesia. J. Arthroplast. 2000;15:1064–1067. doi: 10.1054/arth.2000.8324.

Wang L.P., Hauerberg J., Schmidt J.F. Incidence of spinal epidural abscess after epidural analgesia: A national 1-year survey. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:1928–1936. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199912000-00046.

Гойибов С. С., Нематуллоев Т. К. ДЕТЕРМИНАНТЫ ПЕРИОПЕРАЦИОННЫХ ИСХОДОВ В КОЛОРЕКТАЛЬНОЙ ХИРУРГИИ: РОЛЬ КОМОРБИДНОСТИ И ЗАСТОЙНОЙ СЕРДЕЧНОЙ НЕДОСТАТОЧНОСТИ //ЖУРНАЛ ГЕПАТО-ГАСТРОЭНТЕРОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ. – 2023. – Т. 4. – №. 2.

Матлубов М. М., Нематуллоев Т. К. Гемодинамический статус у пациентов с избыточным весом при колопроктологических операциях //Кардиология в Беларуси. – 2022. – Т. 14. – №. 2. – С. 199-205.

Матлубов М. М., Нематуллоев Т. К. Состояние гемодинамики во время спинальной и эпидуральной анестезии у пациентов с повышенным индексом массы тела при колопроктологических операциях //журнал биомедицины и практики. – 2022. – Т. 7. – №. 2.

Матлубов М. М., Нематуллоев Т. К. СОСТОЯТЕЛЬНОСТЬ ГЕМОДИНАМИКИ У БЕРЕМЕННЫХ ЖЕНЩИН ПРИ ОЖИРЕНИЯХ //Достижения науки и образования. – 2022. – №. 6 (86). – С. 31-34.